|
Size: 586
Comment:
|
Size: 1294
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| = THIS PAGE HAS BEEN MOVED TO SHAREPOINT! = Please refer to this site/make edits here for the most updated information: https://partnershealthcare.sharepoint.com/sites/LCN/SitePages/Namic-Timeline-Discussion.aspx ---- <<BR>> <<BR>> <<BR>> |
|
| Line 6: | Line 17: |
| * metric could be to register and compare scans made within weeks of each other | |
| Line 14: | Line 26: |
| * explore plug & play layer for interfacing between namic kit and freesurfer formats (MRI -> namic) * tensor estimation * see what slicer has and decide if we want to port what we have to ITK * Josh will ask Steve about this * POIStat * namic UNC meeting * Josh and Dennis will make 4-5 slides * POIStats with pictures * contributation to namic |
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN MOVED TO SHAREPOINT!
Please refer to this site/make edits here for the most updated information: https://partnershealthcare.sharepoint.com/sites/LCN/SitePages/Namic-Timeline-Discussion.aspx
April 11, 2006 Notes
- identify test set data set for registration
- ideas:
- use Diana's data set for sensitivities
- use upgrade data set for within subject registration
- metric could be to register and compare scans made within weeks of each other
- goal is to correct for eddy current
- ideas:
- Josh, Dennis will attend Friday Journal club meetings
- Mark has alternative unwarping that takes into account the physics of image captures
- be aware of license conflicts
- meet with Lauren to pick her brain at some point
- reorientation of DTI
- tensor interpolation
explore plug & play layer for interfacing between namic kit and freesurfer formats (MRI -> namic)
- tensor estimation
- see what slicer has and decide if we want to port what we have to ITK
- Josh will ask Steve about this
- POIStat
- namic UNC meeting
- Josh and Dennis will make 4-5 slides
- POIStats with pictures
- contributation to namic
- Josh and Dennis will make 4-5 slides